Forced Migration
June 25, 2008With the Imaging Place work, I am attempting to bridge the gap between people’s visceral experiences in their communities with the global public policies that often drive those experiences. Accordingly, the most fundamental public policy shaping the Cape Verdean experience, as I understand it, is forced migration. The reprehensible history of slavery aside, Cape Verde is prone to devastating periodic drought, as well as, catastrophic economic collapse based on its dependence on shifting world strategic and trade routs.
As Joseph Nevins points out in his book “Dying to Live: A Story of US Immigration in an Age of Global Apartheid,” the problem with immigration policy, both in the United States and elsewhere in the developed world, is that it is viewed as an issue of law and order, rather than one of human rights. This view of migration is at the center of the anti-immigrant sentiment sweeping the United States in recent years.
Defined under international law by the the 1951 Refugee Convention, a refugee is a person displaced from their country due to a well founded fear of ethno-racial, religious or political persecution. According to the United Nations, by the end of 2007 there were more than 11 million refugees world wide and 26 Million internally displaced. This does not include people displaced for economic or environmental reasons. Nevins makes the case that all other human rights are predicated by the right to migrate.
Throughout its history Cape Verdean’s have far to often had to face the daunting decision to migrate or die. As the effects of global warming become increasingly evident, the world has plenty to learn from how Cape Verdean survived experience of forced migration.




